Which factor is NOT considered when determining reliability in a witness statement?

When assessing the reliability of a witness statement, several factors play a crucial role. The first three factors mentioned—opportunity to view, degree of attention, and time between the crime and confrontation—are all integral in determining how accurately a witness may recall events.

The opportunity to view refers to whether the witness had a clear and unobstructed chance to observe the incident. If the witness was positioned in a way that limited their view, their reliability could be compromised.

The degree of attention pertains to how closely the witness was paying attention to the events unfolding. A witness distracted by other factors may miss critical details, impacting the trustworthiness of their account.

The time elapsed between the crime and the witness's confrontation with law enforcement can influence their memory. The longer the time period, the more likely it is for memories to fade or become distorted.

In contrast, the level of experience of the witness—while it may provide some context about their background—does not directly correlate with the reliability of their statement in the same way the other factors do. A witness could have extensive experience in a related field but still lack accurate perception of the event in question. Therefore, this factor is not considered in assessing reliability in the way the other elements are.