What must be honored if one party consents to a search and another does not?

The principle of consent in search and seizure law emphasizes that in situations where one party consents to a search while another party does not, the wishes of the disagreeing party must be honored. This is rooted in the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, which requires that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their domains.

When more than one individual has a right to access a premise and one formally declines consent to search, their authority over the shared space must be respected. This means that consent from the opposing party cannot override the objections of the dissenting individual, even if the consenting party is willing to allow the search.

The other options may suggest other approaches, but they do not align with established legal standards regarding consent in search situations. Understanding this concept is critical for law enforcement professionals as they navigate search and seizure laws while ensuring that they respect individuals' rights.