What could happen if an officer resists during an administrative inspection?

When considering the consequences of an officer resisting during an administrative inspection, the classification of the incident is crucial. When an officer is involved in an administrative inspection and resists compliance, it is typically treated as a misdemeanor rather than a felony. This reflects the understanding that administrative inspections are often regulatory in nature, aimed at ensuring compliance with laws or regulations, and resistance to such inspections does not typically rise to the level of felony conduct.

The classification as a misdemeanor indicates that while the action is a violation and could result in legal repercussions, it does not carry the same severity as a felony charge, which usually involves more serious offenses. This framework helps to delineate the consequences faced by law enforcement during regulatory hurdles.

In other scenarios presented, a felony charge implies a more serious violation, which would not accurately represent the nature of resisting an administrative inspection. Compliance with job duties is necessary, but resisting does not negate the officer's responsibilities, and expulsion from the scene could happen but is not the primary consequence of resistance. Thus, the characterization of resistance as a misdemeanor aligns with the legal framework and expectations of law enforcement conduct during administrative procedures.