What can officers do with individuals not named in a search warrant during a search of a private place?

The correct understanding revolves around the legal principles governing search warrants and the treatment of individuals present during a search. When officers execute a search warrant at a private location, they maintain the authority to ensure the safety of their operation and to prevent the destruction of evidence.

If officers encounter individuals present who are not named in the search warrant, they may have grounds to search those individuals if they have a reasonable belief that those individuals could conceal evidence related to the investigation. The rationale behind this stems from the need to secure the area and to uphold the integrity of the search process.

While it is important for law enforcement to have probable cause before conducting any searches, the context of the situation—such as the behavior of individuals present, their proximity to items of interest, or their involvement in suspicious activities—can influence an officer's decision to search an individual who is not named in the warrant. This capacity aligns with the broader legal framework that allows law enforcement to protect evidence and ensure officer safety during the execution of a search warrant.

In contrast, merely being present during a search does not automatically establish a basis for any action against those individuals, and options that imply unrestricted detainment or limited action without regard to circumstances would not accurately reflect legal expectations in such scenarios.